2024–2025 · source MA25_Q9

2025 Grade 10 ELA Question 9 Sample Student Work

Massachusetts DESE, 2025. primary agency sample set.

MA25-1 response, score and annotation.

Document locator

Source ID
MA25_Q9
Page / identifier
PDF pp. 9–10
Accessed
2026-08-02

Open the primary document ↗ primary document; opens in a new tab

1 attached student record

Excerpts and provenance from this document

Each record below repeats its prompt, conditions, honest evaluator role, direct source link, and exact page locator.

Record MA25-1 · 2024–2025

MA25-1: Source Based Comparative Analysis

Written and published in the 2025 grade 10 MCAS cycle. Massachusetts grade 10; exact age unknown.

Period2024–2025
ScopeFull response coded
ProvenanceB Operational Midpoint Anchor
Band statusmidpoint idea development; top conventions

The author is describing the harsh effects the dust had on the crops and environment during the drought. He is using descriptive language to describe how difficult it was to have crops during this time, which made people money. Steinback also takes on impracticality when describing how there were no crops, which mean't no money.

Three consecutive sentences from the agency-published response; original spelling and punctuation preserved.

Prompt and conditions

Exact prompt. Based on ‘Letters from the Dust Bowl’ and The Grapes of Wrath, write an essay analyzing how the authors develop the conflict between the people and their environment. Be sure to use details from both the letter and the excerpt to develop your essay.

Source conditions
Two Supplied Texts; supplied texts; only authorized dictionaries/glossaries for eligible students.
Time
Exact duration unknown. Two-session secure test; exact individual duration unknown.
Production / archive
CBT default, paper accommodation possible; individual mode unknown; anonymized or image response in agency PDF.
Drafting
in-session work only; no post-feedback revision.
Population and selection
Massachusetts grade 10 operational MCAS response; age, district, mode, time, and supports unknown. Operational response purposively published as a score-point sample.

Scorer and feedback role

Institutional Assessor. Not an authenticated classroom-teacher feedback pair.

Original source classification
6 of 8 — moderately developed ideas; top conventions. Idea Development 3/5 plus Standard English Conventions 3/3, sample D.
Form
Scoring Annotation; response-specific.
Revision after feedback
None survives.

“Although both body paragraphs discuss the approaches used by the authors to develop the conflict between the people and their environment, the contrast in the authors’ writing styles could have been further explained.”

— Published institutional annotation or label, not classroom-teacher feedback
Read the evidence coding

Conceptual claimHenderson is practical/direct while Steinbeck is empathic/descriptive in developing environmental conflict.

Ideas and relationships2 coded units. Style is linked to reader empathy, and environmental damage is linked to crop and economic harm.

AbstractionSustained

Causal reasoningInterpretive

Qualification / counterargumentNone

Evidence useOne Quote From Each Source

OrganizationSource By Source Comparison

Sentence controlControlled

Lexical precisionAmbitious But Unstable

Articulation limitThe proposed stylistic contrast is asserted more than analyzed.

These are descriptive codes, not scores. No composite or rank is calculated. Idea Development 3/5 is general/moderately developed; Conventions 3/3 creates a conventions skew; not a state average.